The
Los Angeles Times: "Probably the city's best selection
of DVDs for sale or rent... it seems to have it all."
NEW
REWARDS/GIFT CARD!!!
$29.98+ TAX
*1/2
OFF ON ALL RENTALS
AND EXTRA DAY FEES!
EARN
POINTS FOR FREE RENTALS!
AVAILABLE
NOW!!!
Card
expires 1 year from date of purchase.
DVD Reviews
by Lon
F for Fake
Okay, having just watched this movie for the second time (and the first
time in its entirety), I can say it's my second-favorite all time Orson
Welles movie.
The #1 slot has to go, of course, to Citizen Kane, which is not just the
finest film of Welles' career but kind of a high-water mark for the first
half-century of American filmmaking. There's a reason Kane hits the top
of nearly any list of the greatest films ever made, and if you're one
of those people that fades movies greatly esteemed by critics, might I
remind you that it's best to hate the game and not the player.
But, after the remarkably moving, powerful and ingenious Kane, F for Fake
is pretty much the greatest thing Welles ever made. And he had a tremendous
career in both radio and film, so that's saying something. I mean, I'm
ranking Fake above some pretty amazing films, like his unfairly-hacked-up-but-still-mesmerizing
Magnificent Andersons, and the taut thriller The Stranger, not to mention
the Anthony Perkins Kafka adaptation The Trial, and the Rita Hayworth
noir Lady from Shanghai, in which he improbably carries off an Irish accent.
First, you'll need some background. Going to this movie without knowing
some context can be rather dizzying. The first time I saw it was late
at night on IFC with my friend Tim, who really should be reading this
blog if he isn't because he appears in about 1/3 of my old college nostalgia
stories. Anyway, we had no idea what was going on - just that it was a
pseudo-documentary by Orson Welles on cable.
And it was terrific. But I'll admit to spending an inordinate amount of
time trying to get my bearings. I'll spare you the same obstacle.
By the mid 1970's, Welles had no real momentum left in Hollywood. Project
after project of his had fallen through, he was unable to get funding,
and though a young generation of artists and filmmakers revered him for
his incredible contributions to cinema, studio executives wanted nothing
to do with his complicated, profitless ventures.
A friend of Welles named Francois Reichenbach at this time was making
a documentary in Europe about an infamous art forger named Elmyr de Hory.
De Hory was living in obscurity on the island of Ibiza while Reichenbach
filmed his day to day life. One of the participants in Reichenbach's documentary
was a man named Clifford Irving, who had written a biography on De Hory
called "Fake."
During the course of filming this de Hory documentary, Clifford Irving
announced to the press that he had been contacted by reclusive billionaire
Howard Hughes, and that Mr. Hughes was going to give Irving the exclusive
rights to publish his autobiography. A worldwide media frenzy ensued,
as Irving provided documents signed by Hughes as proof of their meeting.
To make a long story slightly less long, it was eventually revealed that
Irving's entire story had been a massive hoax. Hughes, who never spoke
to the press and didn't leave the Desert Inn Hotel he had purchased, reluctantly
called reporters to denounce Irving's story and deny ever having met the
man.
So, this was kind of an odd coincidence. The man Reichenbach had used
as an expert on a well-known fraud was himself the perpetrator of a well-publicized
fraud. And, after all, Hughes himself was something of a fraud - a man
who carefully crafted a public image before retreating from it almost
immediately, a man who sold the world on a massive wooden plane that never
flew.
Welles became fascinated with this story. So he gathered up all of Reichenbach's
footage from the now-failed De Hory documentary, filmed footage of his
own, narrated by and starring himself, and added an entire chapter to
the story concerning forged Picasso artwork to create the film F for Fake.
It was the last completed film he'd ever direct, save for an educational
piece for West German TV entitled Filming Othello.
That being said, it's not really a documentary. In his introduction to
the film in the new Criterion 2-disc DVD set, Peter Bogdonovich refers
to it as a "film essay." It's an apt description, but it makes
the film sound very dry. It's almost like a filmed diary on a single subject
- the subject of fakery and charlatanism. Welles has a theme in mind,
and then just throws idea after idea at you, insight after insight, in
a lively and entertaining way. He would have been an excellent blogger.
It also predates the work of contemporary documentarians like Michael
Moore or Nick Broomfield. Welles isn't just making a movie about a famous
Hungarian art forger. He's telling a personal story - it's his take on
the notion of true authorship, on the validity of referring to certain
types of art as "fake" and other types "authentic."
And he relates these opinions with the full force of his filmmaking ability
and warm, eccentric personality.
All of the best sequences in F for Fake tell as much about Welles as they
do the subject of forgery. Sure, there's dozens of fascinating insights
into the world of fraud, especially the observation that the use of "authentication
experts" serves only to confirm the reputation of fraudulent works.
If the film is to be believed, art experts are utterly clueless to tell
a well-done forgery from an authentic work, and that only the forger (and
possibly the artist) will ever know for certain.
But, for me, the film's most interesting segments find Welles exploring
various ideas associated with forgery. One stunning scene finds Welles
considering the cathedral at Chartres, a hauntingly beautiful piece of
architecture by an unknown designer. The cathedral has stood for so long,
has endured so many centuries, that it no longer matters who designed
it and who gets credit for its construction. It simply exists as a monument
to the greatness that mankind can achieve.
In that same way, if a Modigliani survives for hundreds of years, and
it turns out it is not really a painting done by Modigliani but a perfect
copy by De Hory, would that even matter? The name Modigliani wouldn't
concern anyone in thousands of years, but the painting would still have
the power to stir the emotions.
So, the be arguing a case like that, it's clear that Welles has an affection
for tricksters. During one of the most charming sequences in F for Fake,
he briefly relates his own history as a charlatan, starting with his famous
radio broadcast "War of the Worlds," that convinced many a simpleton
New York was being invaded by Martians. The film even opens with him performing
magic tricks for children in a "fake" train station, one of
many inauthentic sets Welles uses throughout the film.
In this way, the style continually draws your attention to its artifice.
He's reminding you that you're watching a movie, even going so far as
to show you cameras turning on and off, switches being turned, and film
unspooling on reels and feeding into projectors. It's the old confidence
game - Welles convinces you that what you're watching is real by showing
you how phony it is, by confiding in you his artificiality up front. You
know you're getting an honest portrayal of how fraud is undertaken because
he's so upfront about lying to you - would a dishonest filmmaker possibly
be so forthright?
Welles was so playful in this film, was having so much fun with filmmaking
conceptually, it's absolutely criminal he was never funded to complete
any more work. In the history of cinema, has there ever been an artist
so shamefully underutilized? The man who crafted this wholly original
and innovative film, a movie which was made 20 years ago and which still
defies any genre or category of film in existance, remained at the top
of his game.
And by this point in his life, Welles had started to come to terms with
his disappointing filmography. He had some hope that F for Fake or his
never-completed South American trilogy would resurrect his career, but
there's a melancholy that hangs over the entire proceeding. At one point,
a shot of Welles, clad in a black cloak, walking slowly away into the
foggy distance, while we hear an audio clip of Howard Hughes. Hughes says:
"It makes me sad that I don't direct pictures any more..."
posted by Lons at 3:21 AM